All guides
29 Apr 20267 min read

How to read a B2Verify Trust Score report

An annotated walkthrough of a B2Verify report for a fictional high-risk supplier – what every panel means, where the score comes from, and what the flags should make you do next.

The fastest way to understand a B2Verify report is to look at one. This guide walks through every panel of a real report, end to end, using a fictional high-risk supplier – Acme Industrial Solutions Ltd (12345678) – as the worked example.

Acme Industrial Solutions Ltd, Director A, Director B, HoldCo Limited and Offshore Holdings (Bermuda) Ltd are entirely fictional examples constructed for illustration. The patterns shown — including dissolution histories, shared addresses, and ownership chains — do not refer to any real company, individual, or registered entity. Any resemblance is coincidental and unintended.

The header – identity at a glance

The first thing you see on any company page is a strip with the registered name, Companies House number, status, incorporation date and registered office. Match these against whatever the supplier has put on their quote or contract before you read another panel.

Preview

Acme Industrial Solutions Ltd

Company number 12345678

Status

Active – Proposal to Strike Off

Incorporated

14 March 2022 (≈2 years)

Registered office

124 City Road, London, EC1V 2NX

What to read here

Three things stop me on this header alone: status is Proposal to Strike Off (the company is in the process of being dissolved), the registered office is a well-known high-density virtual office postcode, and the company is barely two years old. Each of these would matter on its own. Together they're an immediate "stop and ask questions" before anything else.

The Trust Score – one number, one band

The Trust Score is the panel you'll glance at first on every report. It's a 0 – 100 number computed deterministically from the public register, banded into Low (75 – 100), Medium (49 – 74) and High (0 – 48).

Preview

22

/ 100

Trust Score

High risk

Aggregated from nine register-derived dimensions, banded into Low / Medium / High risk.

What to read here

A score of 22/100 puts Acme in the High risk band. Every report shows the score, the band and the colour-coded ring at the top – but the score alone is the headline, not the story. The story is in the breakdown below.

For a full explanation of the bands and what each means in practice, see Understanding the B2Verify Trust Score.

The score breakdown – nine dimensions, one row each

Every report shows the score broken down into the nine dimensions that feed into it. Each row is a self-contained reading: the sub-score, the maximum, and the specific reason the dimension landed where it did.

Preview

Score breakdown

  • Status

    Proposal to strike off — company is in the process of dissolution

    1/20

  • Age

    2 – 5 years — limited filing track record

    11/15

  • Compliance

    Annual accounts overdue and confirmation statement overdue

    0/15

  • Governance

    1 active director on record

    5/5

  • Stability

    3 director appointments / resignations and 2 registered office changes in the last 12 months

    4/20

  • SIC coherence

    SIC codes span 3 sectors — Construction, Real Estate and Professional Services

    2/5

  • Account quality

    Most recent filing is micro-entity accounts

    6/10

  • Address quality

    Registered at a high-density virtual office address (history unverified)

    5/10

Subtotal before deductions

34/100

What to read here

Read each row twice – once for the score, once for the reason. The reason is the data point you can verify on Companies House yourself. If it says "annual accounts overdue", check the filing history; if it says "registered office changed twice in 12 months", look at the address history. The breakdown is a list of receipts, not just numbers.

Deductions – explicit penalties, listed separately

Four classes of issue reduce the score directly, on top of the dimension scores above. These are listed in their own panel so you can see exactly what's been taken off and why.

Preview

Deductions applied

  • Outstanding charges

    3 outstanding registered charges — leverage signal

    4

  • Opaque corporate ownership

    Every PSC is a corporate entity, no individual ultimate owner declared

    3

  • Historical gazette notice

    Strike-off proposal in last 18 months — subsequently suspended

    5

Total deductions

12

What to read here

Subtract the deductions total (−12) from the dimension subtotal (34) and you get the final 22 in the score panel above. The arithmetic is intentionally on the page so you can sanity-check it. If a deduction is listed and you don't understand why, the reason text on the right tells you exactly what's been read off the register.

Risk signals – every flag in one place

The flags panel surfaces every individual risk signal the scoring engine raised – not just the ones tied to deductions. It's the human-readable layer over the structured score: each flag points at a specific data point and what's wrong with it.

Preview

Risk signals (9)

  • Company has a pending proposal to strike off – high risk
  • Annual accounts are overdue
  • Confirmation statement is overdue
  • 3 director appointments / resignations in last 12 months
  • 2 registered address changes in last 12 months
  • Registered at a high-density virtual office address
  • 3 outstanding charges registered
  • 2 corporate PSCs with no declared individual ultimate owner — ownership held entirely via another company
  • Historical strike-off gazette notice found — proposal was subsequently suspended or rejected, but indicates a prior compliance risk

What to read here

A flag count above five on a small private company is unusual. Acme has nine. Several of them stack – virtual office + frequent address changes + opaque corporate PSCs is the structural structure inconsistent with the active trading claims on the quote, not a real industrial business.

Officers – appointment history matters more than current snapshot

The officers panel lists current directors and their appointment dates. On its own that's not very informative – what makes the officer panel useful is clicking through to each director's full appointment history across every UK company they've ever been involved with.

Preview

Officers (1 active)

Director A

Appointed 15 January 2024 · 30+ resigned appointments at dissolved companies

Director B

Resigned 12 August 2025

What to read here

Director A's profile – 30+ resigned appointments, most at dissolved companies – is the single highest-signal item on this whole report. It's the recurring incorporation pattern (see 10 red flags). Anyone with that appointment history fronting a brand-new entity in proposal-to-strike-off is, until proven otherwise, associated with a recurring pattern, which warrants verification.

PSCs – who actually owns this?

The PSC (People with Significant Control) panel shows who owns more than 25% of the company. The pattern to read for here is whether the PSC is an individual person or another company – and if it's another company, whether the chain ever resolves to a named human.

Preview

People with Significant Control (2)

HoldCo Limited

Corporate PSC · 50%+ ownership of shares · Companies House registration: GB

Offshore Holdings (Bermuda) Ltd

Corporate PSC · 25%+ ownership of voting rights · Bermuda

No individual ultimate owner declared at this level

What to read here

Two corporate PSCs, one of them offshore in Bermuda, with no individual ultimate owner declared anywhere on the register. This is the deduction the score panel applied as "opaque corporate ownership" (−3 points). Holding-company structures are sometimes legitimate, but a brand-new private trading company with no named individual at the top of the PSC chain is almost always worth a conversation before contracting.

Filing history – the timeline of events

The filing history panel is the audit trail. Every event the company has reported to Companies House appears here in reverse chronological order – accounts, confirmation statements, officer changes, address changes, charges, gazette notices.

Preview

Recent filing history

  • 21 Aug 2025 · Confirmation statement

    CS01 due — not yet filed (overdue)

  • 4 Jun 2025 · Officers

    TM01 — Termination of appointment of Director B

  • 12 Apr 2025 · Address

    AD01 — Registered office address changed

  • 30 Nov 2024 · Address

    AD01 — Registered office address changed

  • 15 Sep 2024 · Gazette

    DISS40 — Suspension of striking-off action

  • 12 Jul 2024 · Gazette

    GAZ1 — First gazette notice for compulsory strike-off

What to read here

Read the timeline backwards: in mid-2024 a strike-off proposal was filed against Acme (GAZ1), then suspended (DISS40) two months later. Since then there have been two address changes, a director resigning, and a missed CS01. The gazette deduction (−5) on the score panel is reading directly off this history. None of this is hidden – it's all on the public register, here on the page in chronological order.

Address quality – virtual office detection

The address panel shows the registered office and how it stacks up: shared address counts, known virtual-office postcodes, undeliverable flags from Companies House.

Preview

Registered office quality

124 City Road, London, EC1V 2NX

Postcode EC1V 2NX is on the known list of high-density virtual office addresses — over 100,000 active companies registered at this postcode.

Two registered office changes recorded in the last 12 months.

What to read here

Virtual offices are not, on their own, evidence of anything wrong. Plenty of legitimate consultancies and start-ups use them. What flips the signal is the combination: virtual office plus rapid address churn plus dormant-style accounts plus a director associated with the recurring incorporation pattern. Each of those is one degree off normal; together they're a pattern.

Notices — observation, not accusation

When you see an Identity Inconsistency, Recurring Pattern, or Complex Ownership Notice on a report, this is an observation of public register data — not an accusation of wrongdoing. The pattern may have legitimate explanations: a typo on a Companies House filing, a corporate restructuring, a planned acquisition. Use the Notice as a prompt for further verification, not a verdict.

Linked Companies panel

The Linked Companies panel surfaces other UK companies connected to the one you are viewing, organised into four layers:

  • Layer 1 — Shared people: other companies where the same officers serve.
  • Layer 2 — Shared address: other companies registered at the same address (often legitimate — accountants, virtual offices).
  • Layer 3 — Recurring pattern: dissolved companies in similar industries within 12 months.
  • Layer 4 — Complex ownership: multi-layer corporate ownership chains visible from PSC filings.

Layers 1 and 2 are factual lists. Layers 3 and 4 only appear when the algorithm detects the specific structural pattern, and each carries the same observation-not-accusation framing as the Notices above.

The PDF report and the monitor button

Two pieces of UI live below the main report:

  • Download as PDF – the entire report as a print-friendly document. Useful for compliance files and for sharing internally with people who don't use B2Verify.
  • Monitor this company – the bell icon, top right. Adding a company to your monitored list means you get an email the next time the daily check picks up a material change on the register: a new filing, status change, director appointment or removal, new charge.

When to use which

Use the PDF when you need a dated snapshot for the file – onboarding, audit, compliance review. Use the monitor when the relationship is ongoing – live suppliers, partners, large customers – and you want to know about changes the moment they hit the register without re-checking manually.

What to do with all of this

Reports are a tool, not a verdict. Three rules of thumb:

  1. Read the dimension reasons before the score. The score is a summary; the reasons are the data. If you disagree with the score, the reasons tell you which signal to verify on Companies House yourself.
  2. Stack the flags. One flag on its own is usually a conversation. Three or more in the same direction (e.g. virtual office + address churn + opaque PSC) is the pattern that should change your contracting terms – upfront payment, escrow, smaller initial order, or simply a different supplier.
  3. Treat the report as input, not output. It tells you where to look first. The actual decision – to trade, on what terms, with what controls – is yours, and depends on context the register doesn't capture.

Want to apply this to a real counterparty? Search the B2Verify directory – every UK limited company's report has the same structure as the Acme walkthrough above. Or, before you check a counterparty, brush up on the 12-point supplier due diligence checklist.